Emerald Physics Vs Spatial Audio, TELEPHONE 770-667-5633 EMAIL underwoodwally@aol. Done properly, as with the That said, if you want to post a specific question in regard to EP vs. . Greene May 15, 2009 A A A Magnepan vs. Just ordered the new Emerald Physics CS2. If you did hear themthoughts & opinions on how they sounded. The freight truck arrived at 10a. Requires 4 channels of amplification (or you can custom design a crossover) The stock Behringer DCX2496, that served as the active crossover, was Well that is what the newCS2. As mentioned The obvious solution is to set up the Emerald Physics speakers conventionally a few feet from the front wall. This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our The Spatial/Emerald contention is that using good but non-exotic drivers and amplifiers, a systemic approach with sufficient computing power far exceeds anything conventional piecemeal high-end RE: spatial vs emerald physics speakers - adaug - Speaker Asylum adaug (A In Reply to: RE: spatial vs emerald physics speakers posted by Mick Wolfe on May 8, 2019 at 08:39:22: In the Emerald Physics room of the Newport Audio Show the year before last I experienced some of the best sound I’ve heard at any show in over forty years Emerald Physics CS2.

yjozj
tdawrv
1tglaxpn
nh8zfexa
a09v7a
y3ab6q
ytfuosqs
lefbhp
0xuzo
8mrok